All FAQs

Relaunch

Why is a website relaunch risky for SEO and lead generation – and how much traffic loss is normal?

A relaunch is risky because it intervenes in several areas at the same time. Any of them can cost visibility or leads, and most can be safeguarded in advance.

Where the risk comes from

  • URL changes without suitable redirects: Old addresses lead to dead ends, and signals are lost. Google advises redirecting to a relevant page rather than grouping redirects to an unsuitable one, and avoiding redirect chains.
  • Content and structure: Pages that currently drive rankings are removed, merged, or lose copy.
  • Technical setup: Directives from the staging environment (such as noindex) go live, canonicals are incorrect, internal links point to old URLs, or page load times deteriorate.
  • Tracking: Events and conversions are no longer recorded, meaning the impact of the relaunch cannot be measured.
  • User journey: New navigation, forms, and copy alter the conversion rate, even without any SEO loss.

How much loss is normal?

There is no reliable rule of thumb for this, which is why we do not quote percentage figures. Google confirms that fluctuations can occur during major changes while it recrawls and re-indexes the website. According to Google, it can take several weeks or longer for new URLs to replace old ones on medium-sized websites; for larger websites, it takes longer. According to Google, permanent redirects (301) do not lead to a loss of PageRank. Losses occur where redirects, content, or technical implementations are not handled cleanly.

What reduces the risk

Record baseline metrics, compile a complete URL inventory, map every old URL to a suitable new one, test staging for indexing, redirects, and tracking, and monitor indexing, rankings, 404 errors, and conversions after go-live. For large websites, it can make sense to carry out the migration in stages; Google explicitly considers this acceptable. A residual risk always remains, especially when switching domains or CMS; it can be tackled with monitoring, not guarantees.